| Although now a Ph.D. student in the history of mathematics I remain
very interested in mathematics proper. My main field of interest lies in
discrete mathematics (parts of which are also known as
combinatorics). Main interests in combinatorics include Ramsey theory and
links between Ramsey theory and complexity theory.
The hexagon on the right represents one of the simplest yet very beautiful results
in Ramsey theory, a result which is completely elementary. It says, that no matter how
you color the edges of the complete hexagon (all vertices joined by an edge) in two colors
(red and blue), a monochromatic triangle (three vertices joined by edges colored the
same color) will emerge. The proof indicated in the picture is a simple combinatorial
argument. Choose any vertex V with blue degree at least 3 (such a vertex exists...). The
edges which join the three vertices adjacent to V cannot be colored blue without producing
a blue triangle together with V. Thus, these edges must be red to avoid a blue triangle,
thereby producing a red one instead!
Of course, this argument can be generalized. For instance, in order to see that every
3-coloring of a complete 17-gon must produce a monochromatic triangle, pick a vertex
of 1-degree at least 6. Take six 1-adjacent vertices; if any two of them are joined by a
1-edge, a monochromatic triangle is found. Otherwise, we have a two-coloring of a complete
6-gon, and the result proved above applies.
|
|
| Since my good friend
Thomas Britz (PhD) is
working in combinatorics specializing in
Matroid Theory, I have become interested in the subject (at a beginners level).
|
|
|
| Because of its philosophical significance, I have taken up an
interest in the
Four-Colour-Theorem
(4CT) and its proofs.
The four color theorem states that it is possible to color
the regions of a (sufficiently well-behaved) planar map (the countries in a regular
map) using no more than four colors in such a way that two neighbouring regions always
have different colors. This result which was conjectured for more than a century was
proved in 1973 using extensive computer power. The simple figure on the right shows that
three colors do not suffice.
|
|
|
| I have developed an interest in the
Prime Number Theorem (PNT), and in particular in Atle Selberg's
elementary proof of it. In due time, I hope to investigate the proof and its 'elementariness'
in order to describe the concern for
purity of method in modern mathematics which has many similar ideas through
history. Both Selberg and Erdös gave elementary proofs of the PNT, and I would also like
to investigate their differences, as well as the motivations of the IMU for awarding
Selberg the 1950 Fields Medal for his work (including the PNT). |
|
|
| But I am also very interested in other fields such as
harmonic analysis,
complex analysis and the theory of
Lie groups.
|
|
| |
| And of course I am also interested in fields of current mathematics relating
to or reflecting on the history of mathematics that I study. This includes
algebraic geometry (which is the current environment for studying elliptic
functions),
Galois theory (for the study of the theory of equations), and
basic mathematical analysis (which gives the framework for my studies in the
history of infinite series).
|
|
|
| You can find good information on current mathematical topics on the internet.
Some of my favorite sites include:
|
|
| I have uploaded a few simple mathematical papers:
|